Weekly index · week 3 edition

YouTube in AI search: week 3

How much each AI model cites YouTube in its answers, week by week, and where that presence is changing.

This is the week 3 edition, kept as published. See the current edition →

Week 3 · Published ← Week 2 Week 4 →

In short

In week 3, Google AI Overviews was the model that cited YouTube most, in 48.3% of answers, followed by Google AI Mode (33.4%). Significant change from the previous week: Google AI Mode (−9.6 pp), Grok (−4.2 pp), Perplexity (−2.0 pp), Google AI Overviews (−1.7 pp).

In week 3, by model

Share of answers citing YouTube and change from week 2.

Google AI Overviews 48.3% ↓ −1.7 pp vs. W2 Significant
Google AI Mode 33.4% ↓ −9.6 pp vs. W2 Significant
Perplexity 20.9% ↓ −2.0 pp vs. W2 Significant
Grok 18.7% ↓ −4.2 pp vs. W2 Significant
ChatGPT 5.1% ↑ +0.8 pp vs. W2 Within noise
Copilot 0.5% ↑ +0.2 pp vs. W2 Within noise
Gemini 0.2% ↑ +0.1 pp vs. W2 Within noise

Timeline

Weekly presence since week 1. Each panel has its own scale; compare the shape of the curves, not heights across panels. Hollow circles mark weeks with a reduced base; blue markers are events, click to see them.

Google AI Overviews48.3%
scale 0–60%
W1W2W3 Google AI Overviews presence: from 50.3% in W1 to 48.3% in W3.
Google AI Mode33.4%
scale 0–60%
W1W2W3 Google AI Mode presence: from 50.9% in W1 to 33.4% in W3.
Grok18.7%
scale 0–25%
W1W2W3 Grok presence: from 19.5% in W1 to 18.7% in W3.
Gemini0.2%
scale 0–5%
W1W2W3 Gemini presence: from 0.2% in W1 to 0.2% in W3.
Perplexity20.9%
scale 0–25%
W1W2W3 Perplexity presence: from 23.3% in W1 to 20.9% in W3.
ChatGPT5.1%
scale 0–10%
W1W2W3 ChatGPT presence: from 4.5% in W1 to 5.1% in W3.
Copilot0.5%
scale 0–5%
W1W2W3 Copilot presence: from 0.3% in W1 to 0.5% in W3.
YouTube presence by model, weeks 1 to 3 of 2026. Source: data observed and catalogued by First Answer.

All weeks

Week 3 ranking

ModelPresenceWeek change4-week avg.Since W1Change
1. Google AI Overviews 48.3% ↓ −1.7 pp 49.5% ↓ −2.0 pp Significant
2. Google AI Mode 33.4% ↓ −9.6 pp 42.4% ↓ −17.4 pp Significant
3. Perplexity 20.9% ↓ −2.0 pp 22.3% ↓ −2.4 pp Significant
4. Grok 18.7% ↓ −4.2 pp 20.4% ↓ −0.7 pp Significant
5. ChatGPT 5.1% ↑ +0.8 pp 4.6% ↑ +0.6 pp Within noise
6. Copilot 0.5% ↑ +0.2 pp 0.4% ↑ +0.2 pp Within noise
7. Gemini 0.2% ↑ +0.1 pp 0.2% ↑ +0.1 pp Within noise

Presence: share of the model's answers that cite youtube.com among their sources. Changes in percentage points (pp).

Events

Large changes in the series and what is known about them. We only log explanations with a source; when there is none, we say so.

  • W2 · Jan 5–11 No explanation found Google AI Mode falls from 50.9% (week 1) to 43.0% and 33.4% (week 3), and only rises above 40% again in week 8. We found no public change to AI Mode in that window.

W2 · Jan 5–11 · Google AI Mode

No explanation found Google AI Mode falls from 50.9% (week 1) to 43.0% and 33.4% (week 3), and only rises above 40% again in week 8. We found no public change to AI Mode in that window.

Method, in short

Source: data observed and catalogued by First Answer. Each week, we measure by model the share of answers that cite youtube.com among their sources and compare it with the previous week. A change is flagged as significant only when it exceeds the 95% margin and is at least 1 pp. Weeks with a smaller-than-usual base are flagged and left out of the comparison.

Limitations

The index measures what First Answer's base observes, not every search made on the models. We do not disclose volumes, questions, topics, categories, brands, channels or clients; only aggregate measures by model. Claude is not included in this series. Explanations under Events come from external sources and state how confirmed they are.

How to cite

Beckmann, R. (2026). YouTube in AI search: weekly index (week 3, Jan 12–18, 2026). First Answer. https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w03