# YouTube in AI search: week 36

Rodrigo Beckmann · First Answer · Published 2026-10-19 · HTML version: https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w36/

*Weekly index · week 36 edition.* How much each AI model cites YouTube in its answers, week by week, and where that presence is changing.

This is the week 36 edition, kept as published. [See the current edition](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/)

Week 36 · Aug 31–Sep 6, 2026

## In short

In week 36, Google AI Overviews was the model that cited YouTube most, in 62.2% of answers, followed by Google AI Mode (33.3%). Significant change from the previous week: Google AI Mode (+17.2 pp), Grok (+1.8 pp). Google AI Overviews had a reduced base in this comparison. Since week 1, the largest drop is Perplexity's (−22.3 pp) and the largest rise is Google AI Overviews' (+11.9 pp).

## Week 36 ranking

Share of answers citing YouTube and change from week 35.

| Model | Presence | Week change | 4-week avg. | Since W1 | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Google AI Overviews | 62.2% | ↑ +25.9 pp | 43.9% | ↑ +11.9 pp | Reduced base |
| 2. Google AI Mode | 33.3% | ↑ +17.2 pp | 34.5% | ↓ −17.5 pp | Significant |
| 3. Grok | 6.9% | ↑ +1.8 pp | 5.5% | ↓ −12.6 pp | Significant |
| 4. Gemini | 1.6% | ↓ −0.9 pp | 3.1% | ↑ +1.4 pp | Within noise |
| 5. Perplexity | 0.9% | ↓ −0.5 pp | 2.2% | ↓ −22.3 pp | Within noise |
| 6. ChatGPT | 0.3% | ↓ −0.5 pp | 1.9% | ↓ −4.2 pp | Within noise |
| 7. Copilot | 0.1% | → 0.0 pp | 0.1% | ↓ −0.2 pp | Within noise |

Presence: share of the model's answers that cite youtube.com among their sources. Changes in percentage points (pp).

## Timeline

| Week | Dates | Google AI Overviews | Google AI Mode | Grok | Gemini | Perplexity | ChatGPT | Copilot |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| W1 | Dec 29, 2025 – Jan 4, 2026 | 50.3% | 50.9% | 19.5% | 0.2% | 23.3% | 4.5% | 0.3% |
| W2 | Jan 5–11, 2026 | 50.0% | 43.0% | 23.0% | 0.2% | 22.9% | 4.3% | 0.3% |
| W3 | Jan 12–18, 2026 | 48.3% | 33.4% | 18.7% | 0.2% | 20.9% | 5.1% | 0.5% |
| W4 | Jan 19–25, 2026 | 35.1% | 33.9% | 38.2% | 0.3% | 24.9% | 5.1% | 0.6% |
| W5 | Jan 26–Feb 1, 2026 | 24.6% | 35.5% | 37.3% | 0.3% | 26.2% | 5.1% | 0.5% |
| W6 | Feb 2–8, 2026 | 31.4% | 35.1% | 49.6% | 0.3% | 27.2% | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| W7 | Feb 9–15, 2026 | 51.7% | 38.9% | 54.8% | 0.2% | 29.5% | 2.0% | 0.6% |
| W8 | Feb 16–22, 2026 | 52.8% | 41.1% | 53.3% | 0.2% | 32.2% | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| W9 | Feb 23–Mar 1, 2026 | 56.5% | 43.8% | 55.0% | 0.3% | 29.3% | 4.2% | 1.1% |
| W10 | Mar 2–8, 2026 | 58.5% | 47.3% | 59.1% | 0.2% | 26.1% | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| W11 | Mar 9–15, 2026 | 67.2% | 56.1% | 66.1% | 0.2% | 27.7% | 0.2% | 0.7% |
| W12 | Mar 16–22, 2026 | 53.7% | 57.4% | 67.0% | 0.2% | 28.6% | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| W13 | Mar 23–29, 2026 | 66.3% | 55.8% | 76.0% | 0.3% | 33.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| W14 | Mar 30–Apr 5, 2026 | 68.4% | 57.4% | 77.8% | 0.3% | 30.7% | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| W15 | Apr 6–12, 2026 | 65.5% | 54.9% | 82.3% | 0.2% | 29.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| W16 | Apr 13–19, 2026 | 66.2% | 51.7% | 81.9% | 0.7% | 36.6% | 0.4% | 0.3% * |
| W17 | Apr 20–26, 2026 | 71.4% | 56.8% | 62.3% | 0.6% | 33.6% | 1.3% | 0.6% |
| W18 | Apr 27–May 3, 2026 | 70.0% | 56.5% | 67.8% | 0.3% | 32.6% | 1.8% | 0.2% |
| W19 | May 4–10, 2026 | 66.4% | 36.6% | 67.5% | 0.2% | 31.1% | 4.3% | 0.3% |
| W20 | May 11–17, 2026 | 60.5% | 41.6% | 76.2% | 0.2% | 29.6% | 3.9% | 0.2% |
| W21 | May 18–24, 2026 | 47.1% | 52.5% | 79.7% | 0.3% | 37.4% | 6.3% | 0.3% |
| W22 | May 25–31, 2026 | 28.9% | 53.7% | — | 0.4% | 31.4% | 6.4% | 0.3% |
| W23 | Jun 1–7, 2026 | 50.7% | 51.9% | — | 0.4% | 32.4% | 6.0% | 0.2% |
| W24 | Jun 8–14, 2026 | 59.5% | 50.4% | 15.7% | 0.3% | 31.2% | 6.3% | 0.2% |
| W25 | Jun 15–21, 2026 | 60.4% | 46.6% | 15.8% | 0.4% | 22.0% | 1.9% | 0.3% |
| W26 | Jun 22–28, 2026 | 54.2% | 51.1% | 18.9% | 0.4% | 19.3% | 1.4% | 0.2% |
| W27 | Jun 29–Jul 5, 2026 | 51.7% | 49.0% | 19.5% | 0.4% | 27.2% | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| W28 | Jul 6–12, 2026 | 53.3% | 47.5% | 16.9% | 0.5% | 33.0% | 0.8% | 0.1% |
| W29 | Jul 13–19, 2026 | 51.9% | 52.8% | 12.2% | 0.8% | 30.9% | 1.7% | 0.1% |
| W30 | Jul 20–26, 2026 | 50.0% | 54.5% | 12.6% | 0.6% | 18.8% | 1.0% | 0.1% |
| W31 | Jul 27–Aug 2, 2026 | 54.4% | 58.0% | 10.4% | 0.5% | 17.9% | 0.9% | 0.1% |
| W32 | Aug 3–9, 2026 | 38.8% | 52.2% | 6.5% | 1.2% | 14.2% | 1.7% | 0.1% |
| W33 | Aug 10–16, 2026 | 20.2% | 42.4% | 5.1% | 2.7% | 4.7% | 3.3% | 0.1% |
| W34 | Aug 17–23, 2026 | 57.0% | 46.3% | 5.1% | 5.6% | 1.6% | 3.4% | 0.1% |
| W35 | Aug 24–30, 2026 | 36.2% * | 16.2% | 5.1% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.1% |
| W36 | Aug 31–Sep 6, 2026 | 62.2% | 33.3% | 6.9% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.1% |

YouTube presence by model, weeks 1 to 36 of 2026 (% of answers). * = week with a reduced base; — = no data. Source: data observed and catalogued by First Answer.

### All weeks

- [W43 · Oct 19–25](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/): Largest drop: Google AI Mode (−3.6 pp) (current edition)
- [W42 · Oct 12–18](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w42/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+4.0 pp)
- [W41 · Oct 5–11](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w41/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+6.5 pp)
- [W40 · Sep 28–Oct 4](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w40/): Largest rise: Google AI Mode (+14.9 pp)
- [W39 · Sep 21–27](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w39/): Largest rise: Google AI Mode (+18.8 pp)
- [W38 · Sep 14–20](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w38/): Largest drop: Google AI Mode (−15.6 pp)
- [W37 · Sep 7–13](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w37/): Largest rise: Google AI Mode (+6.3 pp)
- [W36 · Aug 31–Sep 6](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w36/): Largest rise: Google AI Mode (+17.2 pp)
- [W35 · Aug 24–30](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w35/): Largest drop: Google AI Mode (−30.1 pp)
- [W34 · Aug 17–23](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w34/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+36.9 pp)
- [W33 · Aug 10–16](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w33/): Largest drop: Google AI Overviews (−18.6 pp)
- [W32 · Aug 3–9](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w32/): Largest drop: Google AI Overviews (−15.6 pp)
- [W31 · Jul 27–Aug 2](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w31/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+4.5 pp)
- [W30 · Jul 20–26](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w30/): Largest drop: Perplexity (−12.2 pp)
- [W29 · Jul 13–19](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w29/): Largest rise: Google AI Mode (+5.2 pp)
- [W28 · Jul 6–12](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w28/): Largest rise: Perplexity (+5.8 pp)
- [W27 · Jun 29–Jul 5](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w27/): Largest rise: Perplexity (+7.9 pp)
- [W26 · Jun 22–28](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w26/): Largest drop: Google AI Overviews (−6.2 pp)
- [W25 · Jun 15–21](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w25/): Largest drop: Perplexity (−9.2 pp)
- [W24 · Jun 8–14](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w24/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+8.8 pp)
- [W23 · Jun 1–7](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w23/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+21.7 pp)
- [W22 · May 25–31](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w22/): Largest drop: Google AI Overviews (−18.1 pp)
- [W21 · May 18–24](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w21/): Largest drop: Google AI Overviews (−13.5 pp)
- [W20 · May 11–17](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w20/): Largest rise: Grok (+8.7 pp)
- [W19 · May 4–10](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w19/): Largest drop: Google AI Mode (−20.0 pp)
- [W18 · Apr 27–May 3](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w18/): Largest rise: Grok (+5.5 pp)
- [W17 · Apr 20–26](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w17/): Largest drop: Grok (−19.6 pp)
- [W16 · Apr 13–19](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w16/): Largest rise: Perplexity (+6.7 pp)
- [W15 · Apr 6–12](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w15/): Largest rise: Grok (+4.5 pp)
- [W14 · Mar 30–Apr 5](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w14/): Largest drop: Perplexity (−2.6 pp)
- [W13 · Mar 23–29](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w13/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+12.7 pp)
- [W12 · Mar 16–22](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w12/): Largest drop: Google AI Overviews (−13.5 pp)
- [W11 · Mar 9–15](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w11/): Largest rise: Google AI Mode (+8.8 pp)
- [W10 · Mar 2–8](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w10/): Largest rise: Grok (+4.1 pp)
- [W9 · Feb 23–Mar 1](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w09/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+3.7 pp)
- [W8 · Feb 16–22](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w08/): Largest rise: Perplexity (+2.7 pp)
- [W7 · Feb 9–15](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w07/): Largest rise: Google AI Overviews (+20.3 pp)
- [W6 · Feb 2–8](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w06/): Largest rise: Grok (+12.3 pp)
- [W5 · Jan 26–Feb 1](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w05/): Largest drop: Google AI Overviews (−10.5 pp)
- [W4 · Jan 19–25](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w04/): Largest rise: Grok (+19.5 pp)
- [W3 · Jan 12–18](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w03/): Largest drop: Google AI Mode (−9.6 pp)
- [W2 · Jan 5–11](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w02/): Largest drop: Google AI Mode (−7.8 pp)
- [W1 · Dec 29–Jan 4](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w01/): Start of the series

## Events

Large changes in the series and what is known about them. We only log explanations with a source; when there is none, we say so.

- **W35 · Aug 24–30** · No explanation found (ChatGPT): ChatGPT falls from 3.4% (week 34) to 0.8% and stays below 0.3% from week 36. We found no public change in the same window that explains the drop.
- **W35 · Aug 24–30** · Reduced base (Google AI Overviews): Google AI Overviews had a much smaller base than usual in week 35; comparisons involving that week are not assessed.
- **W34 · Aug 17–23** · No explanation found (Gemini): Gemini, below 1% for most of the year, rises to 2.7% (week 33) and 5.6% (week 34), falls to 2.5% in week 35 and stays between 0.8% and 1.6% afterwards. We found no public change to Gemini that explains the spike.
- **W33 · Aug 10–16** · Possible (Google AI Mode): Google AI Mode falls from 58.0% (week 31) to 42.4% (week 33) and 16.2% (week 35), swings between 24% and 43% through week 39 and returns to 57.7% in week 40. Between August 11 and September 3, Evertune measured a drop in AI Mode citations overall (from about 21 to 4 sources per answer), and Google acknowledged a link problem in AI Mode on September 4. Neither source mentions YouTube; the week 38 drop and the recovery remain unexplained. [Source: AI Mode Citations Fell 82% in Three Weeks](https://www.evertune.ai/resources/insights-on-ai/ai-mode-citations-fell-82-in-three-weeks) · [Source: Google AI Mode Gemini 3.8 Flash Not Link / Citation Friendly?](https://www.seroundtable.com/google-ai-mode-gemini-38-no-links-42011.html)
- **W33 · Aug 10–16** · No explanation found (Google AI Overviews): Google AI Overviews falls from 54.4% (week 31) to 38.8% and 20.2% (week 33) and returns to 57.1% in week 34; from week 36 it stays between 55% and 65%. We found no announcement or public measurement of this movement.
- **W30 · Jul 20–26** · Observed by third parties (Perplexity): Perplexity falls from 30.9% (week 29) to 18.8%, 14.2% (week 32), 4.7% and 1.6% (week 34), and has stayed between 0.9% and 2.2% since. Ahrefs recorded YouTube’s share of Perplexity citations falling to 20.8% in September, and LLM Pulse currently measures about 1.3% of Perplexity answers citing YouTube. Neither Perplexity nor YouTube has commented on the cause. [Source: The 50 Most-Cited Websites in Perplexity (September 2026)](https://ahrefs.com/blog/most-cited-domains-perplexity/) · [Source: Top Social Sources Cited by Perplexity](https://llmpulse.ai/data-studies/top-social-sources/perplexity)
- **W29 · Jul 13–19** · Observed by third parties (Grok): Grok falls from 16.9% (week 28) to 12.2%, 10.4% (week 31) and 6.5% (week 32), and stays between 5% and 7% through week 38. Goodie observed Grok cutting YouTube from about 42% to under 25% of its social media citations over three weeks in July. xAI has not commented on the cause. [Source: Social Media AI Citations: 16 Sourcing Shifts](https://higoodie.com/blog/social-media-ai-citations-study-2026/)
- **W25 · Jun 15–21** · No explanation found (ChatGPT): ChatGPT falls from 6.3% (week 24) to 1.9% and stays between 0.8% and 1.7% through week 32. We found no public model or search change in the same window.
- **W24 · Jun 8–14** · No explanation found (Grok): Grok returns after two weeks without data (May 25 and Jun 1) at 15.7%, against 67–80% in May. We found no public announcement that explains the change. The same drop appears in the Reddit index.
- **W22–W23 · May 25–Jun 7** · Collection note (Grok): No Grok data in weeks 22 and 23 (May 25–Jun 7): changes to Grok's mechanism prevented data capture in that period. The drop in presence seen after collection resumed is logged separately, in week 24.
- **W21 · May 18–24** · Possible (Google AI Overviews): Google AI Overviews falls from 66.4% (week 19) to 60.6%, 47.1% and 28.9% (week 22), and returns to 50.7% and 59.5% (week 24). On May 20, at I/O, Google merged AI Overviews and AI Mode into a single search experience, and on May 21 a core update began, with a rollout of up to two weeks. No one has linked these changes to YouTube. [Source: 100 things we announced at I/O 2026](https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/ai/google-io-2026-all-our-announcements/) · [Source: Google Launches Core Update Amid I/O AI Search Overhaul](https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-launches-core-update-amid-i-o-ai-search-overhaul/575676/)
- **W19 · May 4–10** · Possible (Google AI Mode): Google AI Mode falls from 56.5% (week 18) to 36.6% and returns to 52.5% in week 21. On May 6, Google announced more links inside AI responses and a preview of perspectives from public discussions and social media. The announcement does not mention video or YouTube. [Source: How AI Mode and AI Overviews help you explore the web](https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/explore-web-generative-ai-search/)
- **W19 · May 4–10** · Possible (ChatGPT): ChatGPT rises from 1.8% (week 18) to 4.3% and 6.3% (week 21), and stays between 6.0% and 6.4% through week 24. From May 5, OpenAI gradually switched the default model to GPT-5.5 Instant, and seoClarity saw ChatGPT citations overall rebound in May. No one has linked the switch to YouTube. [Source: 'GPT-5.5 Instant' is now available, becoming the new default model for ChatGPT](https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20260507-openai-gpt-5-5-instant) · [Source: Tracking the Decline of ChatGPT’s Citations: A Global Trend Analysis](https://www.seoclarity.net/chatgpt-citation-decline-analysis)
- **W16 · Apr 13–19** · Reduced base (Copilot): Copilot had a smaller-than-usual base in week 16; comparisons involving that week are not assessed.
- **W11 · Mar 9–15** · Observed by third parties (Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode): Google AI Overviews goes from 50% in January to 65–71% between weeks 13 and 18, and Google AI Mode from 33% (week 3) to 55–57% between weeks 11 and 14. Tinuiti, with Profound data, recorded YouTube's share of AI Overviews citations more than doubling, and of AI Mode citations more than quadrupling, between January and April. Google has not commented on the cause. [Source: How YouTube became the most cited platform in LLMs](https://digiday.com/marketing/in-graphic-detail-llms-keep-citing-youtube-in-search-results/)
- **W10 · Mar 2–8** · Possible (ChatGPT): ChatGPT falls from 4.2% (week 9) to 0.2% and stays below 1.8% through week 18. The same week, on March 3, OpenAI switched the default model to GPT-5.3 Instant, described as less likely to lean on web results. No one has linked this change to YouTube. [Source: OpenAI releases GPT-5.3 Instant for smoother everyday conversations and better search](https://the-decoder.com/openai-releases-gpt-5-3-instant-for-smoother-everyday-conversations-and-better-search/) · [Source: GPT-5.3 Instant: ChatGPT Shows Fewer Links in Web Search — SEO Impact](https://almcorp.com/blog/gpt-5-3-instant-chatgpt-web-search-fewer-links-seo-impact/)
- **W6 · Feb 2–8** · No explanation found (ChatGPT): ChatGPT falls from 5.1% (week 5) to 0.6%, swings between 1.1% and 2.0% over the next two weeks and returns to 4.2% in week 9. We found no public change to ChatGPT in the week of the drop.
- **W4 · Jan 19–25** · No explanation found (Grok): Grok rises from 18.7% (week 3) to 38.2%, 49.6% (week 6), 66.1% (week 11) and 76–82% between weeks 13 and 16. We found no xAI announcement or public measurement of this rise.
- **W4 · Jan 19–25** · Possible (Google AI Overviews): Google AI Overviews falls from 48.3% (week 3) to 35.1%, 24.6% and 31.4% (week 6), and returns to 51.7% in week 7. On January 27, Gemini 3 became the default model for AI Overviews, and on February 4 Google acknowledged a bug that left some answers without links; SE Ranking measured the missing sources in those weeks. The drop starts earlier, on January 19, and no one has linked these changes to YouTube. [Source: Gemini 3 Replaces 42% of Previously Cited Domains in AI Overviews](https://seranking.com/blog/gemini-3-impact-on-ai-overviews/) · [Source: Google AI Overviews Bug Removes Links & Citations](https://www.seroundtable.com/google-ai-overviews-bug-no-links-40885.html)
- **W2 · Jan 5–11** · No explanation found (Google AI Mode): Google AI Mode falls from 50.9% (week 1) to 43.0% and 33.4% (week 3), and only rises above 40% again in week 8. We found no public change to AI Mode in that window.

## Method, in short

Source: data observed and catalogued by First Answer. Each week, we measure by model the share of answers that cite youtube.com among their sources and compare it with the previous week. A change is flagged as significant only when it exceeds the 95% margin and is at least 1 pp. Weeks with a smaller-than-usual base are flagged and left out of the comparison.

## Limitations

The index measures what First Answer's base observes, not every search made on the models. We do not disclose volumes, questions, topics, categories, brands, channels or clients; only aggregate measures by model. Claude is not included in this series. Explanations under Events come from external sources and state how confirmed they are.

## How to cite

Beckmann, R. (2026). *YouTube in AI search: weekly index* (week 36, Aug 31–Sep 6, 2026). First Answer. https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/indices/youtube-in-ai-search/2026-w36

## Related study

[FA-MET-01 — How to Measure What an AI Recommends](https://rodrigobeckmann.com/en/research/how-to-measure-what-an-ai-recommends/): How many queries it takes to tell an isolated observation from a real pattern.
